WebThere were statistically significant decreases in lingual bone width in both arches after retracting the incisors. Some of the patients demonstrated bone dehiscence that was not visible macroscopically or cephalometrically. When tooth movement is limited, forcing the tooth against the cortical bone may cause adverse sequelae. WebJul 1, 2005 · During the course of treatment, the mean maxillary incisor (iU1x) retraction was 3.7 mm for group I and 5.6 mm for group II ( Figures 3 and 4; Table 3) with a favorable 4° mean increase in the nasolabial angle ( Table 2 ). There was low correlation (46.2%) between the change in the nasolabial angle and incisor retraction.
Predictive Factors Affecting the Maxillary Alveolar Bone …
WebApr 8, 2024 · In malocclusions associated with protrusion and in cases of high skeletal discrepancy, maximum incisor retraction is often necessary to improve not only … WebChanges in lip width tended to mask the changes in lip position caused by retraction of the maxillary incisors, as well as changes in the positions of the alveolar bones and incisor, during orthodontic treatment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the changes in the facial profile related to maxillary incisor retraction and to check for correlations between … describe the role of the operating system
(PDF) Retraction in Orthodontics -A Short Review - ResearchGate
Web"The oropharynx was constricted and the pharyngeal resistance was increased after incisor retraction in adult class I patients with bimaxillary protrusion." Wang Qingzhu, Jia Peizeng, Anderson Nina K., Wang Lin, Lin Jiuxiang. Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion. WebFeb 1, 2000 · In both groups the incisor retraction was accompanied by mesial movement of the buccal segments. Distal movement of the root apex of the incisors was observed in … WebOct 21, 2010 · Every 1 mm of maxillary incisor tip retraction would produce a 0.38 mm retraction of the lower lip. Horizontal lower lip position could be explained by the position of the maxillary incisor tip, the pre-treatment E-line to Li, and interlabial gap with a 51 per cent contribution ratio ( Table 5 ). chrystler 200 s speakers